Psychiatrist criticizes colleagues over antipsychotic medication practices in Oslo

A psychiatrist has voiced strong criticism towards his colleagues while giving testimony in Oslo District Court this week. He argues that Norwegian doctors rely too heavily on the effectiveness of antipsychotic medications, a stance he believes contradicts his interpretation of research findings.

He stated, “The scientific basis for our common practices is disappointingly weak, and the effectiveness of these drugs is systematically overestimated. The issue arises when individuals undergo treatments against their will, often without benefit, and which can potentially cause harm.”

According to recent statistics, nearly 1,800 Norwegians were compelled to take antipsychotic medications in 2020. Various patient organizations have long campaigned against this coercive treatment, although disagreements persist within psychiatric professional circles.

Trond Aarre, a psychiatrist from Førde’s mental health services and an author of several textbooks, testified in a case brought forth by Inger-Mari Eidsvik, who is suing the state for alleged illegal forced medication during a psychotic episode. Aarre pointed to a comprehensive study indicating that only 23 out of 100 patients derive real benefits from these medications, with 14 of those likely recovering even without any drug treatment.

Eidsvik’s claims highlight her frequent involuntary treatments and her opposition to forced medication, which she argues violate human rights. The International Commission of Jurists, assisting in the case, asserts that Norway consistently breaches its legal obligations regarding mental health treatment.

Tensions in psychiatric practices are revealed as differing opinions emerge about the role of antipsychotic medications, with some asserting that psychosis necessitates such treatment, while others call for a more cautious approach, emphasizing the need for informed consent and respect for individual choices.