Finland discusses potential timeline for reopening border with Russia after months of closure

The border between Finland and Russia has been effectively closed for nearly ten months. The initial restrictions began on September 30 of last year, while since December, the barriers at border crossings have remained down, practically halting all movement across the border. This closure is primarily due to Russia sending asylum seekers across the border.

Experts share their insights on the potential timeline for reopening the eastern border. Marko Turunen, Deputy Head of the Border Guard’s Border and Maritime Department, states that reopening hinges on an improved security situation. Currently, there is no information suggesting a change in the situation that led to the closure. He emphasizes that unauthorized entry could continue if crossing points were reopened.

Martti Koskenniemi, an emeritus professor of international law, notes that Finland, as a sovereign state, has the right to manage its borders; however, this right is limited by international obligations, especially regarding refugee status. There is no clear timeframe for when the border should be reopened.

Hanna Smith, a Russia expert, asserts that as long as Russia is engaged in its aggressive war against Ukraine, the border may remain closed. She suggests normalization and respect for neighbors should precede any decision to reopen.

Regarding the introduction of a new repatriation law, Turunen explains that the priority remains on keeping border crossings closed, which has stabilized the situation. Koskenniemi warns that such a law could conflict with Finland’s human rights obligations, proposing it could only be invoked under specific conditions.

When asked if the EU could intervene regarding the border’s closure, Turunen mentions that the European Commission assesses potential violations independently and that sanctions could occur but have not yet been considered for Finland. Koskenniemi predicts EU scrutiny may come, especially if rights are found to be violated. Smith indicates that Finland’s strong reputation in the EU allows for its stance on border management to be trusted.