Kajave disputes Miika J. Norvanto’s claims over film studio in Sotkamo

The Kainuu-based electricity network company Kajave is disputing film producer Miika J. Norvanto’s claims that plans for a film studio in Sotkamo have failed due to insufficient electricity supply. In a recent interview, Norvanto stated that the project fell through primarily because Kajave was not willing to invest in expanding the electricity network according to the studio’s timeline.

In response, Kajave issued a statement clarifying their position. The company claims it can provide the necessary power for the studio project within a one-year timeframe and has not faced issues with connection times in the area. Development manager Jani-Pekka Pantti emphasized that Kajave is capable of delivering substantial electrical capacities within 1 to 2 years, and they can adjust their timelines to align with the client’s construction schedule.

Kajave noted that the power requirements for the film studio would necessitate significant equipment purchases and construction from the client, which is rarely feasible within one year. The company also explained that construction to strengthen the electricity network only begins after a connection agreement is finalized with the customer.

In related news, Norvanto announced plans to move the studio village to a location with existing infrastructure, as the original site at the Emäntäkoulun area in Sotkamo was unsuitable due to surface water issues. Sotkamo’s municipal leader, Mika Kilpeläinen, stated that previous water drainage problems from artificial ponds have been resolved. The sale agreement stipulates that Kajawood cannot sell the land in Vuokatti without construction, but negotiations are possible.

According to the purchase contract, construction must commence within five years, by 2026 at the latest. Kilpeläinen expressed a desire for a resolution soon, suggesting that if Kajawood wishes to sell the land without development, it must still have the municipality’s approval, as it ultimately requires political decision-making. The municipality also retains the option to reacquire the land if construction does not occur, although there is no legal obligation to do so.