Sweden’s new protected species list faces criticism from all sides

Sweden’s updated list of protected species, unveiled Monday by the Environmental Protection Agency, has drawn sharp criticism from environmental groups and landowners alike, reports SVT Nyheter.

Environmental organisations argue the new rules weaken protections for already threatened species, while landowner associations claim the list is overly complex and impractical. “No one in this country can keep track of all these species,” said Gunnar Lindén of the Federation of Swedish Farmers (LRF).

The government tasked the Environmental Protection Agency in July 2025 with revising the list to clarify protection levels based on species’ conservation needs. Critically endangered species would receive stronger safeguards, while vulnerable ones would have weaker protections. Under the proposal, landowners could apply for exemptions—such as logging—even if low-priority protected species are present on their property.

“We’re deeply concerned,” said Beatrice Rindevall, chair of the Swedish Society for Nature Conservation. “If you exempt forestry and agriculture, you’re excluding the very industries with the greatest impact on biodiversity.”

The new list includes 234 plants, fungi, and animals. LRF argues it is unrealistic for landowners to identify all of them. “You’d need an entire team of biologists,” Lindén said. The Forest Industries Federation also questioned the list, stating in its consultation response that protection “should only cover threatened species recognisable to the public.”

The Environmental Protection Agency maintains that landowners must comply with the law. “If you plan major land-use changes, you’re required to check for protected species,” said agency representative Helene Lindahl.

Acting Environment Minister Johan Britz (Liberal Party) defended the proposal, stating that the draft was open for public consultation. Addressing the Society for Nature Conservation’s criticism, Britz said: “When environmental benefits are limited, it’s unreasonable to impose rules with severe economic consequences for private forest owners. Current regulations have often put them in tough financial situations—this is what we aim to change.”

The agency itself has acknowledged challenges, citing tight deadlines and unclear regulations during the process.

Notable additions to the list include hedgehogs, European eels, and lesser white-fronted geese, while species like blue anemones, lilies of the valley, and wood anemones would lose protection.