Researchers question implications of far-right and far-left terminology in Finland

Researchers are reflecting on the implications of the terms “far-right” and “far-left,” considering them problematic because they suggest that these groups operate similarly. In Finland, the Security Police views violent acts associated with the far-left as minimal; however, they may pose risks to public order during protests. Notably, demonstrations against the far-right often attract radical anti-fascist elements from the far-left who are prepared for violence.

The coalition organizing the “Helsinki Without Nazis” protest assures that their intention is to avoid confrontations with far-right groups. Recently, far-right factions alleged that their gathering place was set on fire, an incident currently being investigated by authorities as suspected arson. Tensions could escalate between the factions, especially in light of upcoming Independence Day demonstrations.

The existence of far-right violence has been more extensively studied than that of the far-left, primarily due to the perceived greater threat it poses to security. Scholars highlight difficulties in defining “far-left,” noting it often gets contrasted with far-right extremism, implying a false equivalency despite their differing objectives and methods.

Research indicates that while far-left groups engage in democratic actions, tactics such as civil disobedience may be employed, but typically do not involve direct attacks against individuals. Estimates suggest a presence of dozens to over a hundred active far-left individuals in Finland willing to act violently against far-right groups. Authorities emphasize the importance of discerning between antagonistic protests, asserting that while the far-left’s activities are mainly non-violent, it remains a notable concern during public demonstrations. The organizers of the “Helsinki Without Nazis” movement emphasize their commitment to peaceful methods and avoidance of confrontations.